Gazprom PJSC

Overview

Gazprom PJSC is Russia's largest company by asset value and, until 2022, the world's largest natural gas producer and exporter. It was created in 1989 when the Soviet Ministry of Gas Industry was reorganized into a state corporation, inheriting the USSR's entire gas production, pipeline, and distribution infrastructure. Majority-owned by the Russian federal government at approximately 50.2%, Gazprom operates the Unified Gas Supply System, the world's largest gas transmission network at roughly 175,000 kilometers, and controls the vast majority of Russia's proven gas reserves, estimated above 35 trillion cubic meters, or roughly 15% to 16% of global reserves. Group headcount is around 490,000.

For most of its post-Soviet history, Gazprom's strategy ran on a single axis: exporting Russian gas to European buyers through long-haul pipelines under long-term contracts priced against oil indices. At its mid-2000s peak it supplied roughly 35% to 40% of all natural gas consumed in the European Union, generating export revenues that were a pillar of the Russian federal budget and giving the Kremlin extraordinary leverage over European energy security. In 2008, Gazprom briefly passed ExxonMobilas the world's third-largest company by market capitalization, at approximately $370 billion.

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 broke that model. Europe moved to eliminate its dependence on Russian gas at a speed that surprised most observers. Russian pipeline flows to Europe collapsed from approximately 150 billion cubic meters a year in 2021 to a roughly 50-year low by 2025, after the last major transit route through Ukraine closed on January 1, 2025, leaving only TurkStream at around 17 billion cubic meters a year serving a handful of European buyers. European countries replaced Russian supply with LNG from the United States, Qatar, and Norway. The Nord Stream pipelines, Gazprom's main routes to Germany and northwestern Europe, were destroyed in September 2022 in what remains a contested and officially unresolved act of sabotage. A European market built over five decades was largely dismantled in under two years.

Business overview

Financial collapse and recovery

Between 2022 and 2024, Gazprom's finances deteriorated faster than those of any comparable energy company in recent decades, as the result of deliberate policy choices. In FY2022 it reported record revenue of approximately 11.7 trillion rubles, around $140 billion at prevailing rates, as European gas prices briefly spiked above €300/MWh after the invasion and before European buyers contracted alternative supply. That was the last good year.

In FY2023, Gazprom reported a net loss of approximately 629 billion rubles, its first annual loss in at least two decades. The cause was collapsed export volumes to Europe, lower realized prices as the post-invasion spike unwound, and a sharply higher tax burden including a special monthly gas tax imposed to fund the war. Production fell from approximately 515 bcm in 2021 to roughly 359 bcm in 2023, because the Western Siberian fields built for the European export market had no alternative outlet.

Gazprom returned to profit in FY2024, reporting net income of about 1.22 trillion rubles, roughly $15 billion, on revenue of 10.7 trillion rubles, up 25%, with EBITDA up 76% to 3.1 trillion rubles, its third-strongest year on record. The recovery leaned on one-off and non-core factors rather than a return of European sales: full consolidation of Sakhalin Energy, early cancellation from 2025 of the special monthly gas tax worth on the order of 550 billion to 600 billion rubles a year, and the contribution from Gazprom Neft. The core gas-export business stayed deeply diminished, and Gazprom cut its Saint Petersburg head-office staff by about 40%, from roughly 4,100 to 2,500, in early 2025.

FY2025 held the recovery without extending it. Net profit rose 7% to about 1.307 trillion rubles, revenue fell roughly 9% to 9.771 trillion rubles, and EBITDA declined about 6% to 2.917 trillion rubles, so the profit gain came from below the EBITDA line rather than from trading performance. Gas output fell to roughly 405 bcm, a figure Interfax reported in March 2026 that Gazprom has not confirmed, with an unusually warm heating season cutting domestic demand.

The company has not resumed shareholder payouts. The board recommended no dividend for FY2025, as it had for FY2024, citing rising debt-service costs and a focus on reducing debt. Total debt stood at roughly 6.7 trillion rubles, with net debt at about 2.07 times EBITDA, and Gazprom has paid a dividend only once since February 2022. Investment in new infrastructure, including Power of Siberia 2 and long-planned Arctic developments, has been deferred or slowed. Market capitalization, about $370 billion at its 2008 peak, had fallen to roughly $39 billion by late 2025.

Geopolitical context

Gazprom cannot be understood separately from Kremlin foreign policy. Under Vladimir Putin, who rose to power partly through his association with the gas sector and served on Gazprom's board in the 1990s, the company was used explicitly as an instrument of state power. Supply disruptions to Ukraine in 2006 and 2009 and to other post-Soviet states were deployed as political pressure, often disrupting European supplies as transit disputes spilled into the main arteries. European governments that deepened their dependence on Russian gas in the 2010s, most notably Germany through its Nord Stream 1 and 2 approvals, are now widely criticized for putting short-term economic convenience ahead of energy security.

Nord Stream 1, operational from 2011 at roughly 55 bcm a year, and Nord Stream 2, completed but never commercially operated, were the centerpieces of Russia's export infrastructure to Europe. Their destruction in September 2022, in an operation that cut through heavily monitored Baltic seabed and required sophisticated naval or diving capability, has been attributed variously to Russian, Ukrainian, and Western actors with no definitive public conclusion. It removed the physical infrastructure for any near-term resumption of large-scale Russian pipeline exports to Germany. The operating company, Nord Stream 2 AG, avoided bankruptcy through a creditor debt-restructuring agreement in May 2025, and a possible revival of the route has been floated as a bargaining element in reported U.S.-brokered settlement talks, though any resumption would be distant and politically fraught.

TurkStream, running under the Black Sea to Turkey and into southeastern Europe, is now the sole route for Russian pipeline gas into the European Union after the Ukraine transit agreement expired and flows stopped on January 1, 2025. It carried roughly 16.8 bcm to Europe in 2025, chiefly to Hungary at around 8 bcm and Serbia at around 2.2 bcm, countries that have not fully aligned with EU energy sanctions. Gazprom's remaining European volumes are a fraction of pre-2022 levels and serve markets where political relationships with Russia stay closer than the EU mainstream.

Key considerations

The path to durable recovery is structurally constrained. The European market that generated the high-priced, long-term contract revenues underpinning Gazprom's cash flows is gone for the foreseeable future and almost certainly permanently at pre-2022 scale. Europe has invested billions in LNG import terminals, pipeline interconnections, and demand reduction, and its dependence on Russian gas has fallen from about 40% to single digits. Even under a hypothetical post-war normalization, European policymakers have said explicitly that Russian supply will not return to former levels, for reasons of energy security.

China cannot replace Europe on comparable terms. Knowing Gazprom has no other major buyer, China negotiates from a structurally strong position, and the prices it pays for Russian gas are reported to be well below historical European contract levels. Power of Siberia carries volumes from East Siberian fields never connected to the European market, so that revenue is genuinely additive. Power of Siberia 2, which would redirect West Siberian gas formerly sent to Europe, remains unresolved despite the September 2025 memorandum, with price and financing disputes that reflect the asymmetry of the negotiation.

Gazprom's future is a function of how the war in Ukraine ends and what settlement follows. A comprehensive peace and normalization with Europe could in theory revive some flows, since Europe still has physical infrastructure on its side of the border and Russian gas is cost-competitive in many European markets. Political will to re-accept dependency is very low across European capitals, and new LNG infrastructure locks in alternative supply for decades. Under Alexei Miller, who has led Gazprom since 2001 and was reappointed to another five-year term in February 2026, the company has been reoriented from a global energy giant toward the Russian domestic market, China, and a small number of remaining export customers. Its return to profit in 2024 and 2025 was real, and it rested on one-off gains and a tax cut rather than a revival of the export business that once defined it.

Sources